By Feroze Mithiborwala
18 January, 2015
Medhajnews.com
Fact 1: ‘Terrorist Leaves ID CARD’ is part of an elaborate frame-up
Fact 2: The ‘Getaway car’ and the ‘Abandoned Car’ in which the ‘ID’ was found are two different cars of the same Citroen C3 model.
Fact 3: The 24×7 Police Security Provided to Charlie Hebdo had been withdrawn ~ Why? ~ When? ~ Who Issued the Order?
Fact 4: Eye-witness report from ‘France Info Radio’, Role of Police and suspicious character spotted 4 hours prior to the attack
Fact 5: All the four terrorists were police informers, terrorist recruiters known and working for French Intel
We begin by saluting the people of France for not surrendering to xenophobia and fear and for standing united at a moment of a grave national crisis. The ‘March for Unity’ has shown the way as to how nations should respond to mass psychosis and fear that are generated after massive terror attacks that are increasingly becoming the norm.
This despite the presence of an all-encompassing global security surveillance state like none other time in human history.
The marchers also reaffirmed their commitment to combat terror, religious fanaticism, racism and hate-mongering by the anti-immigrant Neo-Nazis and sections of the corporate media. We also condemn the terror attack on Charlie Hebdo and the Jewish Supermarket where 17 people lost their lives.
The following our detailed facts that have been garnered from various sources. The following Five Facts prove that Paris was a False Flag terror operation.
FACT 1: ‘Terrorist Leaves ID CARD’ is part of an elaborate frame-up
International Legal Expert, Prof Francis Boyle (8.1.15):
“CNN just reported that one of the Kouachi brothers left his ID card in the Citroen getaway car, which is how they “identified” them. You have to be an idiot to believe that.”
Note that the highly trained paramilitary killers go about their shooting in a very cool calm and calcualted manner, killing 10 journalists in the space of a mere five minutes, even as they methodically read out their names from a list.
The two mercenary-terrorists had their faces covered to hide their identities. This too is surprising as one would have expected them to remove their ski-masks after the massacre and proudly proclaim their evil deed to the world, so as to claim martyrdom and the 72 Hurs waiting for them.
But yet these highly trained professional killers ensure that they have carried their ID’s, which one of them leaves behind. Thus this ID-Card concoction is a sure giveaway and has been used and played over ad nauseum by Intelligence agencies.
As writes Kevin Barett, the Editor of Veterans Today –
“Since when did criminals leave their identification cards in abandoned getaway cars? What are the odds that skilled terrorists who have just carried out an ultra-professional special-forces style attack will accidentally leave their ID card in the abandoned getaway car? Answer: Effectively zero.
So why are police reporting an event that cannot have happened? Assuming that French police really did find “terror suspect” Said Kouachi’s ID card in an abandoned getaway car, that ID card must have been planted by someone wishing to incriminate Kouachi. Even the legendary French idiot detective, Inspector Clouseau, could not fail to make this thunderingly obvious inference. The discovery of Kouachi’s ID does not implicate him; it exonerates him. It shows that he is an innocent patsy who is being framed by the real perpetrators of the attack.”
This lead is a giveaway for any honest discerning person.
Fact 2: The ‘Getaway car’ and the ‘Abandoned Car’ in which the ‘ID’ was found are two different cars of the same Citroen C3 model (comparative photo below)
The ‘getaway car’ which headed for another destination was conveniently replaced by this ‘abandoned car’ in which the Said Kouachi ID card was already present. The frame-up is evident.
Also note that whilst the getaway car had silver side-mirrors, the abandoned car found by the police has black side-mirrors
This glaring anomaly is also being widely discussed and publicized as part of the expose’.
An analysis of this video will further seek to explain and further prove our position.
In this video you will notice that after having slaughtered 10 people in cold-blood, the terrorists come down and instead of immediately making a fast get-away choose to shout slogans to reaffirm their Muslim identity, once without revealing their own by unmasking themselves.
Here you can clearly see that their Citroen had ‘silver side-mirrors’, which you must then compare to the side-mirrors of the ‘abandoned car’ in which the ID-Card was found.
They are the same Citroen C3 model but two different cars, without a doubt.
Now it gets even more interesting and even laughably atrocious. Even as the terrorists begin to head out, just a 100 meters down the lane, we see a police car that approaches them. The terrorists get down from their car and fire at the police car. The police instead of firing back, decide to reverse down the road. Were the police by now yet unaware that a terror attack had struck the premise of Charlie Hebdo? They clearly had been notified by now.
Thus the police car reverses all the way down the lane.
But more interestingly, the terrorists – instead of reversing themselves, decide to move straight ahead, right in the direction of the police car parked at the end of the lane, which does not make any attempt to block their get-away. The terrorist car then takes a left-turn and disappears with no attempt by the police car to even chase the terrorists!
This is simply far too bizarre, revealing and astounding by all standards.
It appears as if the entire terror operation was conducted in a ‘controlled environment’. To me it certainly does.
Fact 3: The 24×7 Police Security Provided to Charlie Hebdo had been withdrawn ~ Why? ~ When? ~ Who Issued the Order?
This is a photograph of a police van right outside the Charlie Hebdo office on the 9th of January 2015. Why was this security cover ‘Pulled-Out’ prior to the attack, even as it was known that the Magazine was an obvious target for a terror attack for over eight years and a red-terror alert loomed over Paris?
This is another glaring anomaly on all counts, which further reveals the hand of pro-US-Zionist elements within French Intelligence, police and the security apparatus.
Since the Charlie Hebdo premises had been an obvious target for the last 8 years due to the satire cartoon issue, they had been provided with police security with a Police Van stationed right outside the premises on a 24×7 basis.
It is clear to all there was no presence of the police at all at the time of the attack. The point being that the two-terrorists barged right through the front door of the premises and they were let in by a journalist.
Who was responsible for this order?
Was it the Chief of Police of Paris or the Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve himself?
Who signed the order to withdraw the ‘24×7 security cover’ for the magazine?
Note, France, especially Paris has been on a state of high alert ever since Sydney and Peshawar, and all through the course of the last week over Christmas and New Year, where we were being told that an attack is imminent. Thus the absence of the police van outside the Hebdo Premises is not only a glaring anomaly, “not an intelligence failure”, but another part of the incriminating evidence against the French Intelligence.
Answers to these simple queries are only the starting point and no explanations to these simple straight-forward questions have still emerged from ‘official sources’
Fact 4: Eye-witness report from ‘France Info Radio’, Role of Police and suspicious character spotted 4 hours prior to the attack
A police car and a mysterious individual were seen outside Charlie Hebdo (CH) offices very early morning 4 hours before the terror attack took place.
Only one hour after the attack, ‘France Info’ succeeded in gathering testimony from witnesses and neighbours of the murdered journalists. On the public radio site, one of these testimonies entitled -
“What was said inside the building was we will avenge the Prophet” said a neighbour.
France Info’s written report also highlighted what it considers to be the most important piece of information reported by this witness working in the building: the fact that he heard (or it was reported to him) the statement made by one of the terrorists regarding the avenging of the Prophet.
Serious questions arise from the eye-witness testimonies
Another part of his testimony, also of great importance, has been ‘edited from the radio programme.’
According to this man, “a police car” was present at his arrival around 7:30am, four hours prior to the terror attack.
Curious detail but not amazing as Charlie’s team was deemed to be protected by the police.
BUT – his wife Jeannette Bougrab and his colleague Laurent Léger – have stated that ‘police protection for Charlie Hebdo had recently been told to stand down.’
It is also interesting that when questioned by France Info, this witness stated that he saw what he described as a ‘suspicious individual outside the offices, at the same time as the police car’.
This report compiled by France Info, further raises the following questions:
This confirms the fact that the ‘24×7’ police security cover had been withdrawn.
This even as the terror alert across Paris had been heightened as warnings had been issued due to the holiday season.
Who issued the order for the police security cover to stand down?
On which date was the order issued?
More remarkably, who was the suspicious person present surely undertaking a recce before the massacre, present at the very same time as the police car?
Fact 5: All the four terrorists were police informers, terrorist recruiters known and working for French Intel
Who were the Four Terrorists, their specific backgrounds?
Interestingly, all the four terrorists were known to French Intel and were being tracked, their mobile phones were tapped and thousands of pages of transcripts are reportedly available of the same.
The Said and Cherif Kouachi Brothers, Algerian French, were orphans and given to petty crime in the immigrant ghettoes where they grew up. It was from their journey as criminals, police informers to terrorist recruiters and terrorists to finally the patsy-fall guys.
They have both known to have flown to Yemen in 2011 and met Awlaki the Al Qaeda leader. Also note that Awlaki is very closely linked to the CIA and has visited the Pentagon frequently on their invitation.
Oops! Paris Attackers Funded by Awlaki, the Pentagon Dinner Guest! http://bit.ly/1C5T6gl
Abu Hamza, the hook handed hate preacher who recruited jihadist from his mosque in London, is said to be one of the mentors of Cherif Kouachi.
The Daily Telegraph in London reports that Cherif Kouachi was a follower of Djamel Beghal , a prominent Al Qaeda recruiter. The newspaper further reports that Cherif was mentored by Abu Hamza, the hook-handed hate preacher who was sentenced to life in prison in New York on terrorism charges on January 9.
Thus French Intel was clearly aware that the Kouachi Brothers were in contact and part of the top terror recruiters and operators and by no means small fry, that could have escaped and gone below the surveillance radar.
Both are on the No-Fly List of the Americans and the British as well. So how were they flying out to regularly to Turkey and from thereon to Yemen, Syria and Iraq?
The Associated Press reported in 2008 that Cherif Kouachi had been sentenced to three years in prison in Paris for helping to funnel prospective jihadi fighters from France to Iraq. He served 18 months, with the remainder of his sentence was suspended. In that case, Cherif was named as a member of the 19th arrondissement network, named for the mainly North African neighborhood where they were based. The reasons for the suspension of the terror-related sentence have never been stated publicly. Cherif had thus turned into an informer and a terror recruiter entrapping Muslim youth for ISIS ans Al Qaeda.
The New York Times first reported on Cherif in 2005. It was reported that he had become inspired to fight in jihad due to the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuses . Prior to the emergence of those abuses, the Liberation newspaper reported , Cherif was not a devout Muslim. He had girlfriends, smoked and drank alcohol. On January 8, the day after the Charlie Hebdo attack, a rap video apparently featuring Cherif Kouachi appeared.
Amedi Coulibaly and his ‘wife’ Hayat Boumedienne
In fact, the third terror suspect in the Paris terror attack, Amedi Coulibaby, met with French President Nicholas Sarkozy in 2009, when he was 27 years old. This only proves the extent to which Coulibaly was on the trsuted lits of informants and terror recruiters for French Intel.
Assuming all of the presentation’s participants would have been vetted by the President’s office prior to the event, one has to ask how come Sarkozy’s staff would have missed the fact that according to France’s L’Obs, Coulibaly had just been imprisoned at Fleury-Mérogis (2005 – 2006) and with co-suspect Cherif Kouachi. In addition, French Authorities were also aware at this time that Coulibaby had been ‘radicalized’ in prison.
The Guardian reports:
“French media reported that Coulibaly had converted and become radicalised in prison. After an initial spell in prison for armed robbery, he was reported to have then started drug-dealing and served another sentence.”
Was this event an audition, or was it part of constructing Coulibaly’s cover? It’s shocking to discover just how involved Coulibaly was in not one, but two of the French Security Service’s top-tier terror cases in recent years.
According to the Washington Post, only 10 months after his introduction toSarkozy, police searched Coulibaly’s apartment and found a large cache of weapons, including 240 rounds of heavy ammunition (240 7.62 mm caliber cartridges) and photos of him with one of France and American CIA’s top terrorist targets, radical Islamist Djamel Beghal Murat, who the US referred to as a “known al Qaeda recruiter in Europe” and who was planning an attack against the US Embassy in Paris in 2010
for more;
http://bit.ly/1AJrCIV
